You’re Probably Just Using the Wrong One
Let’s get something out of the way.
There are no bad sim racing frames.
Repeat after me.
There are no bad sim racing frames.
A desk isn’t bad.
A wheel stand isn’t bad.
A folding cockpit isn’t bad.
A centre-post cockpit isn’t bad.
A tubular steel cockpit isn’t bad.
And an aluminium-profile cockpit containing enough metal to construct a respectable garden shed isn’t bad either.
They are tools.
They were designed to do different jobs.
The problem is marketing.
Because somewhere along the way, we stopped selling sim racing cockpits according to what they were designed to do and started selling them as levels of achievement.
Desk: Toy.
Wheel stand: Beginner.
Folding cockpit: Beginner who’s getting ideas above his station.
Steel cockpit: Enthusiast.
Aluminium profile: Serious racer.
And finally:
Massive aluminium profile + 20 Nm wheel + hydraulic pedals: Professional.
Congratulations.
You have completed sim racing.
Except you haven’t.
You’ve completed shopping.
What Does a Frame Actually Do?
This is surprisingly simple.
A sim racing frame has one fundamental job:
Keep you, your wheel and your pedals in the same place.
That’s it.
Your wheel pushes against your hands.
Your brake pushes against your foot.
Your body pushes against the seat.
And all of those forces eventually travel into the frame.
What we want is:
DRIVER ↔ WHEEL ↔ PEDALS
to remain a stable mechanical relationship.
If the wheel moves, information is lost.
If the pedal plate flexes, consistency is lost.
If the seat moves, your braking reference changes.
If your entire simulator wanders across the floor under heavy braking, we’ve probably gone slightly wrong somewhere.
The frame doesn’t make your wheel better.
It doesn’t make your pedals better.
It simply allows you to use what you already paid for.
A €150 Wheel Stand Isn’t a Bad €1,000 Cockpit
Imagine you buy a simple wheel stand.
You put a Logitech on it.
Or a Thrustmaster T300.
You play Gran Turismo.
Maybe Euro Truck Simulator.
Maybe Farming Simulator.
It works.
Perfectly.
Then three years later you buy a 15 Nm Direct Drive wheelbase.
You attach it to the same stand.
Turn into Eau Rouge.
The wheel goes left.
The stand goes right.
The television briefly considers leaving the room.
And you announce:
“This wheel stand is rubbish.”
No.
It isn’t.
You have attached an industrial electric motor to a piece of folding furniture.
The stand didn’t change.
The job changed.
The Driver Is Part of the Specification
This is something cockpit specifications almost completely ignore.
Two people can use exactly the same:
- wheel
- pedals
- frame
- game
and put completely different loads through the structure.
I see this at home.
My younger son still races GT7 using a Thrustmaster T300, load-cell pedals and a Playseat Evolution.
And it works.
The load-cell pedals don’t magically destroy the frame.
Why?
Because his leg doesn’t produce enough braking force to significantly flex the structure.
For him, the system works.
My older son is stronger.
Same basic idea.
Same load-cell technology.
But now considerably more force goes through the pedal structure.
And we’re reaching the point where that cockpit is no longer the right tool for him.
Did the Playseat suddenly become worse?
No.
The driver changed.
This gives us one of the most important rules in this article:
Don’t ask whether a cockpit supports load-cell pedals.
Ask whether it supports YOUR LEG using load-cell pedals.
“Load Cell Compatible” Tells You Almost Nothing
We discussed this in our previous article.
A load cell is a sensor.
A pedal with a 100 kg load cell does not mean the user is continuously applying 100 kg of force to the pedal face.
Different drivers calibrate their pedals differently.
A child might use relatively little force.
An adult might use considerably more.
A driver deliberately reproducing a real racing car might use much more again.
So when a cockpit advertisement proudly announces:
LOAD CELL COMPATIBLE
Wonderful.
Which load?
Which pedal geometry?
Which user?
Which calibration?
How much pedal-deck deflection occurs at the forces I actually use?
Those would be useful questions.
The sticker isn’t.
Direct Drive Ready™
This one is even better.
A modern Direct Drive wheelbase might produce:
3 Nm.
5 Nm.
8 Nm.
12 Nm.
15 Nm.
20 Nm.
25 Nm.
So saying:
DIRECT DRIVE READY
is rather like selling a bridge and writing:
VEHICLE READY
on the box.
Bicycle?
Volkswagen?
Fully loaded Scania?
There may be a difference.
The useful question isn’t:
“Can I bolt a Direct Drive wheel to it?”
The useful question is:
“How much torque was this structure actually designed to handle?”
Marketing loves compatibility.
Engineering prefers loads.
We should probably listen to engineering.
And Then There Is the Seat
People tend to think of the seat as the comfortable thing attached to the frame.
It isn’t.
Once you start using a meaningful brake force:
The seat becomes part of the braking system.
Your foot pushes the brake.
The brake pushes back.
Your pelvis pushes into the seat.
The seat pushes into the frame.
Newton was unfortunately quite clear about this sort of thing.
So now we have:
FOOT → PEDAL → FRAME → SEAT → BODY
as one mechanical system.
And suddenly the seat matters rather a lot.
Five Minutes of Mario Kart Is Not an Endurance Race
Let’s return to the Playseat Evolution.
For the right job, I actually like it.
Sit down.
Five-minute race.
Mario Kart.
Casual Gran Turismo.
T300.
Moderate pedal forces.
Absolutely fine.
There is even something I rather like about its infamous centre post.
It sits between your legs.
Normally this is presented as a disadvantage.
But for a child learning to race, it has an interesting side effect.
It practically forces:
left foot → brake
right foot → throttle
Which is exactly the habit I want them learning.
Something one reviewer sees as an irritating design flaw can therefore become useful in another application.
Again:
There are no bad frames.
Now Do the Same Thing for 40 Minutes
Install a stronger load-cell brake.
Put an adult in the seat.
Start a forty-minute league race.
Brake.
Again.
Again.
Again.
Again.
Now the seat and frame are doing a completely different job.
The pedal structure has to resist repeated loads.
Your body needs to remain in the same position.
Your lower back needs support.
Your pelvis needs support.
And the whole thing needs to remain comfortable after:
10 minutes.
20 minutes.
30 minutes.
40 minutes.
A seat can feel absolutely wonderful when you sit in it in a showroom.
That tells you remarkably little about whether it will still feel wonderful after fifty heavy braking zones.
Comfort Is a Performance Feature
This is another specification we don’t discuss enough.
Imagine your back begins hurting after twenty-five minutes.
Now you’re adjusting your seating position.
Your pelvis moves.
Your relationship to the pedals changes.
Your braking changes.
Your concentration changes.
Perhaps your lap times begin wandering.
This isn’t simply a comfort problem anymore.
It’s a consistency problem.
For five-minute racing, almost any reasonably comfortable seat can work.
For forty-minute league races with load-cell pedals?
Ergonomics becomes equipment.
For multi-hour endurance racing?
It becomes absolutely fundamental.
Force × Driver × Time
This gives us a much more useful way of thinking about cockpits.
Not:
Cheap → Expensive
Not:
Beginner → Professional
But:
FORCE × DRIVER × TIME
This isn’t a physics equation.
Please don’t send angry emails to Newton.
It’s an equipment-selection rule.
How much force does your wheel generate?
How much force does your leg generate?
How large and strong is the driver?
How long will they sit there doing it?
Those questions tell you much more about the cockpit you need than the price of the wheelbase.
So Let’s Put Frames Back Where They Belong
1. The Desk
Yes.
A desk.
The thing sim racers eventually become embarrassed about admitting they once used.
For:
- Farming Simulator
- Truck Simulator
- casual Gran Turismo
- Forza
- children
- occasional racing
- lower-force wheels
a desk can be brilliant.
Attach the wheel.
Put the pedals underneath.
Race.
When you’re finished, remove the wheel.
You still have a desk.
Remarkably clever.
2. The Wheel Stand
Now you want something dedicated.
But perhaps you don’t have space for an entire cockpit.
A good wheel stand gives you:
- better wheel mounting
- consistent pedal position
- easy storage
- relatively small footprint
For moderate hardware, it can be exactly the right solution.
And when you’ve finished racing?
Fold it.
Move it.
Your living room becomes a living room again.
This is not a disadvantage.
For many people:
It’s the entire point.
3. Folding and Entry-Level Cockpits
This category gets unfairly attacked.
They’re relatively inexpensive.
Compact.
Often adjustable.
Easy to live with.
Great for children.
Great for casual users.
Great for moderate wheel and pedal forces.
Their limitation isn’t that they’re “beginner equipment”.
Their limitation is load capacity and long-session ergonomics.
Know that and they’re excellent tools.
Ignore it and you’ll eventually become angry at a product for not doing a job it never promised to do.
Or at least shouldn’t have promised to do.
Which brings us back to marketing.
4. The Rigid Steel Cockpit
Now we’re entering the territory where many serious sim racers may never need anything more.
A properly designed steel cockpit can handle:
- modern 5–8 Nm Direct Drive
- substantial load-cell pedal forces
- long league races
- endurance racing
- different seats
- multiple wheelbases
- adult drivers
without requiring your living room to resemble an industrial shelving warehouse.
This is also the natural territory of our own Blue Dragon Racing Sceleton 1.0.
It was designed primarily around the hardware we believe most sim racers actually need:
5–8 Nm Direct Drive
load-cell pedals
long-session stability
with wheelbases up to approximately 10 Nm.
And we’re quite happy to tell you where its territory ends.
Because if you’ve bought a 20 Nm wheelbase and want enormous braking forces…
you shouldn’t buy our frame.
You need something else.
5. Aluminium Profile
And now we arrive at the Holy Land.
Aluminium profile.
The final destination.
The place every serious sim racer must eventually reach.
Apparently.
Except aluminium profile isn’t a promotion.
It’s a solution.
And it’s an extremely good one.
Aluminium profile offers enormous rigidity.
It’s modular.
It’s configurable.
You can attach practically anything to it.
High-torque Direct Drive?
Fine.
Very heavy brake forces?
Fine.
Motion system?
Excellent.
Professional training equipment?
Exactly.
Real motorsport driver trying to reproduce the physical environment of their race car?
Now aluminium profile makes enormous sense.
This is where it belongs.
Not above steel in some imaginary sim-racing caste system.
But in applications requiring the characteristics it provides.
The Problem With Aluminium Profile
There are trade-offs.
A substantial profile cockpit takes space.
A lot of it.
It’s heavy.
Once built, it tends to become furniture.
Industrial furniture.
If one person uses it, fantastic.
Set everything precisely.
Seat.
Wheel.
Pedals.
Monitor.
Done.
But if the simulator has to serve dramatically different drivers, things can become less elegant.
A child.
An adult.
A tall adult.
A short adult.
You can absolutely build adjustability into an aluminium rig.
Seat sliders.
Pedal sliders.
Adjustable mounts.
There are excellent solutions.
But that adjustability doesn’t magically appear because the frame is aluminium.
You have to design and buy it into the system.
And the more extreme the differences between users, the more important that becomes.
So again:
What is the job?
Aluminium Makes Perfect Sense for Real Motorsport Training
This is where I think high-end simulator hardware becomes genuinely fascinating.
Imagine you’re a real racing driver.
You know exactly which car you’re preparing for.
You want:
- correct seating position
- correct wheel position
- realistic steering load
- realistic brake force
- correct pedal geometry
- consistent body support
- perhaps motion
- perhaps additional controls
Now we’re no longer building a general-purpose gaming cockpit.
We’re building:
A training machine.
Space isn’t the primary concern.
Weight isn’t the primary concern.
Maximum adjustability between Dad and his ten-year-old may not be the primary concern.
The simulator has a specific driver.
A specific job.
A specific car.
Now a heavy, extremely rigid, highly configurable aluminium-profile structure makes complete sense.
That’s exactly the sort of problem it is brilliant at solving.
Congratulations. You Bought 15 Nm.
But let’s imagine you’re not a racing driver.
You ignored our wheel article.
The internet told you 8 Nm wasn’t serious enough.
So you looked at 12.
Then somebody said:
“Headroom.”
Ah.
Headroom.
The most expensive word in sim racing.
So you bought 15 Nm.
Congratulations.
There’s one tiny problem.
Your existing cockpit doesn’t particularly enjoy 15 Nm.
So now you need another cockpit.
And at these loads, a properly designed heavy-duty steel or aluminium-profile solution becomes increasingly sensible.
Fine.
Let’s buy aluminium.
Congratulations again.
You Have Unlocked the Upgrade Chain
You started with:
I want a better wheel.
Then:
15 Nm wheel
↓
Current frame isn’t enough.
↓
Aluminium cockpit
↓
Well, we’re doing this properly now.
↓
Those pedals look suspiciously inexpensive.
↓
New pedals
↓
They deserve a better seat.
↓
New seat
↓
Monitor mount.
↓
Shifter mount.
↓
Keyboard tray.
↓
Several mysterious pieces of aluminium that cost €79 each.
And six weeks later your €700 wheel upgrade has become a €3,000 simulator.
Then somebody asks how much sim racing costs.
You stare thoughtfully into the distance.
And say:
“Well… it’s still cheaper than real motorsport.”
At This Point, Perhaps Try Real Motorsport
You’ve bought 15 Nm because real race cars can have heavy steering.
You’ve bought a brake capable of enormous forces because real race cars can have heavy brakes.
You’ve bought an aluminium chassis because your wheel and pedals require it.
You’ve bought a bucket seat.
You’re physically training your arms.
You’re physically training your left leg.
You’re sitting inside enough aluminium to qualify for planning permission.
There’s really only one logical next step.
Go racing.
You’re 35?
Perfect.
Walk into the nearest motorsport team.
Place your helmet on the desk.
And announce:
“I’m ready.”
They may ask about your racing experience.
Don’t worry.
Tell them you have 15 Nm.
Of Course, There Is Another Option
You could have bought:
5–8 Nm Direct Drive
Good adjustable load-cell pedals
A sufficiently rigid steel cockpit
A comfortable seat
And then…
raced.
For years.
GT7.
ACC.
iRacing.
Rally.
Formula cars.
Endurance.
League racing.
Daily races.
Would the aluminium cockpit have been stronger?
Of course.
Would 15 Nm have been more powerful?
Obviously.
Would the €800 pedals have been beautifully engineered?
Probably.
But there’s that annoying question again:
What problem were you solving?
Don’t Confuse Upgradeability With Upgrading
There is one area where spending more on a frame can be extremely sensible.
Future use.
My younger son can use his current cockpit perfectly well.
There is absolutely no reason to replace it.
But as he grows, his legs become stronger.
Eventually the load he puts through the pedals will exceed what that structure handles comfortably.
Then he will need another frame.
That’s not because the old frame became bad.
He grew out of it.
Just like a bicycle.
The interesting question when buying a more substantial cockpit is therefore:
How much room does this give me to grow before I need to replace the entire structure?
That’s a legitimate reason to spend more.
But there’s an important difference between:
buying enough headroom for realistic future development
and:
buying equipment for a future version of yourself that may never exist.
Buy for the Driver You Actually Are
This may be the most useful rule in this entire series.
Don’t build a simulator for:
Future Professional Racing Driver You™
unless you’re actually planning to become one.
Build it for what you do.
If you race GT7 for twenty minutes at a time:
build for that.
If you race forty-minute league events:
build for that.
If you race three-hour endurance events:
build for that.
If your children use the simulator:
build adjustability into it.
If you need to fold everything away after racing:
buy something foldable.
If you’re training for a real racing car:
build a training simulator.
And if you genuinely love enormous aluminium rigs and simply want one?
Excellent.
That’s also a reason.
“I want it” is a perfectly respectable answer.
It’s much better than inventing a technical requirement afterwards.
There Are No Bad Frames
So we’ll finish where we started.
A desk isn’t bad.
A wheel stand isn’t bad.
A Playseat isn’t bad.
A steel cockpit isn’t bad.
An aluminium-profile cockpit isn’t bad.
A professional simulator chassis isn’t automatically better than all of them.
Every one solves a different problem.
The mistake is treating them as levels:
Beginner → Intermediate → Serious → Professional
They’re not.
They’re tools.
And tools should be selected according to the job.
So before buying your next cockpit, forget the marketing labels.
Ask four questions:
How much force?
Which driver?
How long?
How much adjustment?
If your current cockpit handles those four things…
Congratulations.
You already own the correct cockpit.
You don’t need an upgrade.
You need a race.
And if you already bought the 20 Nm wheel, 200 kg pedals, bucket seat and enormous aluminium chassis because one day you’re definitely going to become a racing driver…
Excellent.
The Emperor finally has somewhere very rigid to sit.
– Orrak
Blue Dragon Racing Founder
ALR League Driver & Proud Supporter of Sim Racing
Leave a Reply